“Sugar cereals” were everywhere in the 80’s and 90’s.
But there was always one caveat – they were marketed as “part of a balanced breakfast” and pictured with orange juice, toast and usually some fruit. Like so:

Peer-to-peer fundraising should be marketed the same way – as “part of a balanced fundraising program.”
People love peer-to-peer for the same reason they love sugar cereals: it’s grrrrrreat in the short term. In peer-to-peer, you get that spike of revenue, a bunch of new donors, and a ton of social media mentions.
But there’s a crash coming.
You know your donor retention rate for all those new donors will be maybe 5%. You know that all those social media mentions will amount to… a few new followers and not much else. You know that unless you do that fundraiser again next year, all that revenue and all those relationships go away.
There IS absolutely a place for peer-to-peer fundraising in an otherwise healthy fundraising environment, just like there’s a place for the occasional bowl of Frosted Flakes.*
All those new donors, and revenue, and social media mentions are good and helpful, after all.
But our goal in fundraising should be to begin and cultivate long-term relationships. Donors who give to you for years.
In the same way you can’t build a healthy body when your meals are predominantly sugar cereal, you can’t build a healthy fundraising program when your revenue and new donors predominantly come from peer-to-peer.
* Personally, I prefer Cap’n Crunch with “Crunchberries.” And those little pink spheres stretch the definition of “berries” so far as to be unrecognizable… but dang they taste great.
Steven Screen is Co-Founder of The Better Fundraising Company and lead author of its blog. With over 30 years' fundraising experience, he gets energized by helping organizations understand how they can raise more money. He’s a second-generation fundraiser, a past winner of the Direct Mail Package of the Year, and data-driven.





